![]() It is interesting to contrast the two, and, indeed, is necessary to our purpose for this contrast brings out most prominently, and sets in strongest light and shade, the main features of the theory of the origination of species by means of Natural Selection. Though it is just possible that one who regards the kinds of elementary matter, such as oxygen and hydrogen, and the definite compounds of these elementary matters, and their compounds again, in the mineral kingdom, as constituting species, in the same sense, fundamentally, as that of animal and vegetable species, might admit an evolution of one species from another in the latter as well as the former case.īetween the doctrines of this volume and those of the other great naturalist whose name adorns the title-page of this journal, the widest divergence appears. Views so idealistic as those upon which his ‘Thoughts upon Species’ are grounded, will not harmonize readily with a doctrine so thoroughly naturalistic as that of Mr. Dana would be in this volume, he could not be expected to accept this doctrine. But he has been obliged to lay aside his pen, and to seek in distant lands the entire repose from scientific labor so essential to the restoration of his health-a consummation devoutly to be wished, and confidently to be expected. The duty of reviewing this volume in the American Journal of Science would naturally devolve upon the principal editor,’ whose wide observation and profound knowledge of various departments of natural history, as well as of geology, particularly qualify him for the task. Darwin describes through which the views most favored by facts will be developed and tested by ‘Natural Selection,’ the weaker ones be destroyed in the process, and the strongest in the long-run alone survive. A spirited conflict among opinions of every grade must ensue, which-to borrow an illustration from the doctrine of the book before us-may be likened to the conflict in Nature among races in the struggle for life, which Mr. Who, upon a single perusal, shall pass judgment upon a work like this, to which twenty of the best years of the life of a most able naturalist have been devoted? And who among those naturalists who hold a position that entitles them to pronounce summarily upon the subject, can be expected to divest himself for the nonce of the influence of received and favorite systems? In fact, the controversy now opened is not likely to be settled in an off-hand way, nor is it desirable that it should be. At least it is a more readable book: but all the facts that can be mustered in favor of the theory are still likely to be needed. It will be far more widely read, and perhaps will make deeper impression, than the elaborate work might have done, with all its full details of the facts upon which the author’s sweeping conclusions have been grounded. ![]() The volume itself-the proof-spirit-is just condensed enough for its purpose. For the volume itself is an abstract, a prodromus of a detailed work upon which the author has been laboring for twenty years, and which ‘will take two or three more years to complete.’ It is exceedingly compact and although useful summaries are appended to the several chapters, and a general recapitulation contains the essence of the whole, yet much of the aroma escapes in the treble distillation, or is so concentrated that the flavor is lost to the general or even to the scientific reader. An abstract of the argument-for ‘the whole volume is one long argument,’ as the author states-is unnecessary in such a case and it would be difficult to give by detached extracts. Two American editions are announced, through which it will become familiar to many of our readers, before these pages are issued. This book is already exciting much attention. by Asa Gray THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION (American Journal of Science and Arts, March, 1860)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |